Dehumanization In 1984 By George Orwell - 1579 Words

George Orwell utilizes his novel 1984 to pass on that individuals, as a species, are greatly vulnerable to dehumanization and abuse in the public arena. Orwell shows how an administrations control of innovation, dialect, media, and history can persecute and debase its subjects. In 1984 the political control of innovation persecutes the general population of Oceania and prompts the defeat of independence and of the qualities that characterize mankind. Telescreens and the Internet are utilized not for diversion purposes but rather to screen individuals lives. For Orwells situation, Pynchon refers to media advancements, for example, intelligent level screen TVs and the Internet as instruments of observation (Deery). The effect of†¦show more content†¦In 1984 government officials intentionally control ideas and thoughts. This incapacitates the human capacity to express sentiments and feelings, which is precisely what the totalitarian government wants. We might pound you down to the point from which there is no returning. Things will transpire from which you couldnt recoup, on the off chance that you carried on a thousand years. Never again will you be equipped for standard human feeling. Everything will be dead inside you. Never again will you be equipped for adoration, or companionship, or delight of living, or chuckling, or interest, or boldness, or trustworthiness. You will be empty. We might press you exhaust, and afterward we should fill you with ourselves (Orwell 148). By controlling dialect the Party replaces singular feeling with Party purposeful publicity. To communicate their dehumanizing purposeful publicity, the legislature in 1984 controls the media and introduction to it. Individuals cant shape their own particular conclusions and subsequently should depend on the media to do as such for them. The general population of Oceania cant think basically, for instance, about open figures. In any case, what was weird was that despite the fact thatShow MoreRelatedOppression and Dehumanization in George Orwells 1984 Essay1621 Words   |  7 PagesMikalaitis English 9 12 April 2012 Oppression and Dehumanization of Society in George Orwell’s 1984: The Manipulation of Technology, Language, Media and History George Orwell uses his novel 1984 to convey that human beings, as a species, are extremely susceptible to dehumanization and oppression in society. Orwell demonstrates how a government’s manipulation of technology, language, media, and history can oppress and degrade its citizens. In 1984 the political manipulation of technology oppressesRead MoreGeorge Orwells 1984: Methods of Suppression in 1984. A study of ways people were oppressed in the book.1532 Words   |  7 PagesMethods of Suppression in 1984 George Orwells anti-utopian novel 1984 paints a picture of a society in which the individual has no freedom, hope, or feeling. Three super states called Oceania, Eurasia, and Eastasia, divide and ravage the earth with perpetual war between them. The story takes place in Oceania, which consists of the Americas as well as Great Brittan. Nineteen-eighty Four chronicles Winston Smiths struggle to fight against the forever-reining, oppressive social system called theRead MoreGeorge Orwell s 1984 And Modern Day Society1504 Words   |  7 Pagestuition prices of colleges and loans to the government. Dehumanization by the totalitarian government in the book 1984 by George Orwell is similar to the dehumanization in modern society between the government and colleges onto the student through high tuition costs and overpowering government control which causes loss of opportunity. The concept of dehumanization occurs in the book 1984 and in modern day society with a restriction on choices. In 1984 Winston Smith’s limitations were to either performRead MoreAdolf Hitler And The Nazi Germany1133 Words   |  5 Pagesthe book 1984, George Orwell describes a world similar to that of the Nazi Germany. An assortment of parallels can be drawn between the totalitarian governments of Adolf Hitler and Orwell’s fictional â€Å"Big Brother.† Complete power, propaganda, and dehumanization are three main topics related to both Orwell’s novel and Nazi Germany. Complete power is achieved by the dictatorship and totalitarianism. Brainwashing in both cases uses tactics of propaganda and invasion of privacy. Dehumanization is createdRead More1984 Analytical Essay861 Words   |  4 Pagescreativity are what make us human. In 1984, George Orwell uses his dystopia to show that if we were to abolish these abstract emotions we would cease to be human and become the simple primates we once were; surviving for the sake of survival. Orwell uses Winston and Julia’s relationship to show the power of the human emotion of love. Winston is a pessimistic man that has nothing to live for except for life itself, until he meets a love interest; Julia. Orwell narrates â€Å"At the sight of the words  IRead More1984 Individualism Essay1207 Words   |  5 PagesTotalitarianism, derived from a society which proceeds without cautiousness towards governmental power, can induce many limitations among citizens and every aspect of their lives including individualism. In George Orwell’s 1984, the artificiality of the dystopian country influenced the protagonist of the novel, Winston Smith, to try and deceive the government in any way possible. Winston and many others view individuality as immensely important, but a large challenge to achieve due to the diminishedRead MoreGeorge Orwell s 1984, Winston1832 Words   |  8 PagesThesis: In George Orwell’s 1984, Winston resists the Party’s degra dation of basic human rights through his intimate relationship with Julia in an effort to maintain his individuality. His example inspires people today to find ways to preserve their civil liberties when faced with oppression. Party’s degradation of basic human rights Winston’s resistance to the Party’s dehumanization through his intimate relationship with Julia Conclusion: Orwell’s call for all people to fight for the preservationRead MoreWhy Were Governments Established?975 Words   |  4 Pagesextraordinary author named George Orwell had this concept of an unjust government in his book 1984. The book written about a totalitarian government, a government who is merely concerned for its own agenda, forcing its people to do exactly as the rulers say. As well as providing sublime examples of the dangers of a totalitarian government, Orwell provides examples of what it is to be a human in these conditions, and tells his audience what being a human should consist of. 1984 was primarily written toRead MoreAnalysis Of The Novel 1984 By George Orwell1602 Words   |  7 PagesWhile no other time period comes close, the novel we have been reading in class deals vigorously with dystopian society. 1984, by George Orwell, is a dystopian, fiction-based book that features a main character named Winston Smith, a girl named Julia, and many others who come together to make for a very intense storyline and an intriguing read. It takes place in Oceania, in 1984, while it was written in 1948. With a sense of science fiction, it’s set in near-future Oceania. The city is still namedRead More1984 and Equilibrium - Battle for Individual Freedom2220 Words   |  9 Pagesplace or state in which everything is unpleasant or bad, typically a totalitarian or environmentally degraded one (The Free Dictionary). Characteristics of a dystopian society are shown throughout George Orwell’s novel 1984, and in the 2002 film Equilibrium directed by Kirk Wimmer. W inston Smith, in 1984, is a lower ranked member of society, with an outer party member job. He is watched twenty-four hours a day, seven days a week through telescreens set up throughout Oceania. He always finds the Party’s

The Teachability Dilemma of Entrepreneurship - 1296 Words

Entrepreneurs are a very, or perhaps the most, important boost in our economy. They do not only take the risk for the sake of a business, but also they provide our economy with employment opportunities and culture. A society can only be prosperous only when it rewards and encourages entrepreneurial activity because in fact, it is the entrepreneurs and their activities that are the critical factor for success, prosperity, growth and opportunity in any given economy. Entrepreneurship is not easy and it comes with its own risks and up and downs. On the last decade, entrepreneurship has rose and expanded, with this change and constant expansion, it has changed the rules of entrepreneurship once again. But I certainly believe that†¦show more content†¦He or she must accept enough risk to innovate and create, but not so much that the business or activity is not profitable. Entrepreneurs also require certain characteristics that are necessary for success. The characteristics of many entrepreneurs include spontaneous creativity and a willingness to make decisions in the absence of solid data. He or she may be driven by a need to create something new or build something tangible. As new enterprises have low success rates, a person in this role must also have considerable persistence. He or she may have the greatest chance of success by focusing on a market niche either too small or too new to have been dominated by established businesses. One of the disadvantages of being an entrepreneur is that it has a lot of vulnerabilities. For example, entrepreneurs may face social risk if their innovations challenge societal norms, or they may face psychological risk as their hard work affects their families peace of mind. Many find that the independence, notoriety, and feeling of contributing something valuable to society that often come with being an entrepreneur outweigh these dangers. All of this values mentioned above are characteristics required in a great, perhaps on all successful, entrepreneurs. But everybody needs to find the characteristics needed in

Story Nursing Theory free essay sample

Story Theory is a middle-range theory put forward by Mary Jane Smith and Patricia Liehr in 1999. They believe that stories are an essential part of nursing practice. They believe that stories are just as important to diagnose and treat as the physiologic bodily responses of the patient. In fact, often it is the stories that clarify and give meaning to the measurements of physiologic response. Smith and Liehr posit that all nursing encounters take place within the framework of a story.Story Theory proposes that story is a narrative happening wherein a person connects with self-in-relation through nurse-person intentional dialogue to create ease. (Smith Liehr, 2005) Ease occurs amid accepting the whole story as one’s own. This is a process of attentive embracing the intricacy of one’s situation. The theory is based on three concepts that are clearly identified and defined. The first is intentional dialogue which is defined as â€Å"the central activity between nurse and person that brings story to life; it is querying emergence of a health challenge story in true presence. (Smith Liehr, 1999) The second concept is connecting with self-in-relation. This is defined as â€Å"an active process of recognizing self as related with others in a developing story plot uncovered through intentional dialogue. † (Smith Liehr, 1999) Creating ease is the third concept. It is defined as â€Å"remembering disjointed story moments to experience flow in the midst of anchoring. † (Smith Liehr, 1999) These definitions are fairly simple and concise. Although self-in-relation is a new term coined by the theorists, like intentional dialogue and creating ease, it is a very explicit concept. Even without reading the stated definitions and explanations, one readily gets a good sense of what they mean. The concepts themselves readily convey their meaning. This is one of the theory’s strength. Secondary supporting definitions are given. For example, the theorists offer a definition of ‘flow’ as â€Å"an experience of dynamic harmony† and ‘anchoring’ as â€Å"an experience of comprehending meaning. † (Smith Liehr, 1999) This clarifies potentially vague concepts and makes the theory less general. The concepts are presented in a logical, sequential arrangement both in relationship to each other and overall structure of the theory. The nurse engages in a purposeful dialogue with the patient and family about his illness- what has brought him to this encounter; she is actively exposing the patient’s personal history ( where the patient has been, where he is now, and where is he going ). She facilitates reflective awareness where the patient is encouraged to share physical bodily experiences, thoughts and feelings. The story comes together and culminates in the patient and the nurse understanding meaning for the patient. By exploring the bigger picture context is given to the patient’s current condition.In other words the concepts represent a beginning, middle, and an end, just like a story. In this way the concepts are interdependent and fit succinctly within the walls of the theory. The diagrammatic representation of Story Theory is simple and incorporates the three concepts of the theory. It uses three cascading ellipses to show a working relationship among the concepts, the nurse, and the patient. Story theory with method. (Smith Liehr, 2005) Intentional dialogue is highlighted and positioned in the center. This speaks to its centrality in the theory.It is the medium through which the patient and the nurse engage to connect with self-in-relation and to create ease. The diagram includes the method dimensions associated with understanding and applying each concept. The nurse interacts with a person through intentional dialogue about a complicating health challenge, where connecting with self-in-relation follows as the developing story-plot emerges through story sharing. As the storyteller makes obvious what may have been unspoken, moments of ease foster movement toward resolving the health challenge. Smith Liehr, 1999) The diagram is effective in that it encompasses the theory’s concepts in an uncomplicated layout. This structure is consistent with the principles of the theory. The ellipses are connected just as the concepts are interrelated and interdependent. The broken lines throughout signify that actors and concepts share a dynamic relationship and interchangeably affect the practice environment. Creating ease is represented as a smaller ellipsis. An explanation is not given by the theorists. One reason could be that although this concept is important, Smith and Liehr, 1999 point out that it is sometimes elusive.As stated previously, Story Theory is a very simple practice theory. As shown the main concepts are combined to give the theory its’ meaning and efficacy. There are two main relationships expressed. The primary one is that between the nurse and the patient and family. This relationship is created as a consequence of a health challenge, and involves developing the patient’s story. The patient as the story teller is respected and the nurse’s role is to support and guide the patient toward discovering what has meaning. It is a trusting relationship that involves the nurse actively listening without making assumptions or judgments. The second relationship is the patient’s relationship with self. It is the outcome of intentional dialogue with the nurse. The patient having reflected on his past and gains a better understanding of the present. The patient recognizes and accepts himself and his place in the world. These two relationships are active, positive, and exploratory. The provide information for the nurse, patient family and other clinicians involved in the patient’s care. They are aimed at helping the patient and family overcome or cope with a health challenge so they can move forward. Story Theory describes the patient’s history of illness and health, and explains how his current situation fits into the bigger picture. It also describes how this is necessary for the patient and family to cope. In this way it is somewhat predictive as it states that if the nurse guides the patient to reflect, he will connect with his past and present circumstance and consequently will be able to move forward. In this way the theory imparts understanding and creates meaning for the patient.The theory has a specific purpose for nursing. It is geared at helping sick patients and families understand their illness and how to cope with it. It uses storytelling as a specific path for achieving this. This is definitely purposeful for nursing in that allowing a person to connect with self-in-relation is a component of caring. It allows for good history taking and for illness to be seen through the eyes of the patient. It allows for what is important to the patient to be uncovered. This will be incorporated into the treatment plan, making it more patient-focused.This will lead to increased compliance and effectiveness. The theory can also be used for a person experiencing a range of health challenges. Whether it is an unexpected pregnancy, anxiety related to a new job, or a diagnosis of cancer. In each case the person has a story to tell. This gives Story Theory very broad application across the different practice specialties. Story Theory can also be useful for research. It is guided by the phenomenological method. It helps to uncover how people make sense of specified life situations. By gathering stories the research yields nowledge and understanding about lived experiences. This can be especially useful in generating emancipatory knowledge. A similar methodology was used by Paulo Freire when he explored illiteracy among Brazilian sugar cane workers in a society where literacy was required to vote. (Butts Rich, 2011) Consequently, Story Theory can be useful for other disciplines. It has proven useful for the discipline of education. It was used by a university to successfully create an innovative honors level nursing course. (Carpenter, 2010) Story Theory is an important contribution to nursing.It incorporates the metaparadigms of the discipline. It shows how interactive and central they are. The patient as the person experiencing a health challenge tells his story to the nurse. The patient’s story is predicated on his view of his health or lack thereof, and his environment past and present. Nursing occurs when the nurse guides the patient to reflect on, and understand his life circumstances so as to make sense of, and accept his current situation. I like the theory for its simplicity and holistic approach to practice.However, there are two unresolved issues that could decrease the efficacy of the theory. It is possible that the patient might not accept his present condition and is not able to move forward. For example, someone who is young and lives a healthy lifestyle might never be able to understand, accept, and cope with a diagnosis of terminal cancer. Similarly, what matters most to the patient might be totally unrelated to the health challenge at hand. This could pose a real dilemma. References Butts, J. B. , Rich, K. L. (2011).